塞拉利尼转基因致癌研究获“真相揭秘者”奖, 转基因专家诬陷塞拉利尼研究破产!
而《欧洲环境科学》发表该论文是因为它“希望用理性的讨论处理该文章”,该杂志编辑Winfried Schroder在一项声明中表示:“科学上的进步需要旨在发现最好方法的辩论。” 但是中国挺转基因人士仍无视这些事实,仍坚称这是谣言,其目的不过是为屏蔽转基因真相,以为其转基因商业化的利益。 如2014年7月,基因农业网发表文章《关于法国转基因“致癌”实验的科学主流声音》称,这项实验属于因利益关系而专为反转而设,实际上是以实验手段的另类方式来制造谣言;即便造谣这项“实验”也不专业。 今年5月,联合国世界卫生组织下属的国际癌症研究所宣布,“有充足证据”表明,草甘膦在实验动物中是致癌物,另有“有限的证据”表明,草甘膦对人类可能致癌。世卫组织的这项宣布实际上是支持了塞拉利尼的研究,而近日塞拉利尼教授因此获得了“真相揭秘者”奖。 转基因观察在此对海外华人jrry86的翻译表示感谢。 塞拉利尼教授获得“真相揭秘者”奖 2015年10月19日 Whistleblower award goes to ProfGilles-Eric Séralini (翻译:jrry86;时间: 15 October 2015;连接: Roundup researcher honoured by Federationof German Scientists (VDW) and the International Association of Lawyers AgainstNuclear Arms 农达除草剂研究者塞拉利尼获得德国科学家联盟(VDW)和国际反对核武器律师协会联合颁发的“真相揭秘者”奖。 Prof Gilles-Eric Séralini will tomorrow behonoured with the 2015 Whistleblower Award by the Federation of GermanScientists (VDW) and the German Section of the International Association ofLawyers Against Nuclear Arms (“IALANA”). 明天塞拉里尼教授将被德国科学家联盟(VDW)和国际反核武器律师协会德国分会(IALANA)联合授予2015年“真相揭秘者”奖。 Prof Séralini will receive the award inrecognition of his research demonstrating the toxic effects of Roundupherbicide on rats when administered at a low environmentally relevant dose overa long-term period. After the research was published, Prof Seralini wasattacked in what the VDW and IALANA call “a vehement campaign by ‘interestedcircles’ from the chemical industry” as well as from the UK Science MediaCentre. This smear campaign led to the retraction of his team’s paper by thefirst journal that published it. But Prof Seralini and his team fought back,countering the scientific arguments raised against their research andrepublishing their paper in another journal. 塞拉里尼教授获得此奖,是奖励其开展的科学研究证明了农达除草剂在与环境中浓度相当的低剂量下即可给大鼠带来长期毒性。此项研究发表之后,塞拉利尼教授受到攻击,VDW和IALANA称之为“来自化工业‘利益集团’和英国科学媒介中心的激烈反应”。这个抹黑运动导致其团队的文章被首发杂志撤稿。但是塞拉利尼教授和他的团队奋起反击,全面回应了针对其研究的科学质疑,并最终在另一个杂志上重新发表了文章。(译者注:塞拉利尼对所有质疑的全面回应见其网站:http://www.gmoseralini.org/category/critics-answered/,多数人不知道的是,虽然塞拉里尼的文章被《食品和化学毒理学》杂志撤回,但是他们对所有质疑的回应倒是又正式发表在同一杂志上,见: http://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ... i/S0278691512008149,而塞拉利尼被撤回的文章则重新发表在《欧洲环境科学》杂志上:http://www.enveurope.com/content/26/1/14) While Prof Séralini’s study was not acarcinogenicity study but a long-term toxicity study, the carcinogenicpotential of Roundup was confirmed this year when the World HealthOrganisation’s cancer agency IARC published its verdict that glyphosateherbicides are “probable” human carcinogens. |
手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|中国琉球网 ( 闽ICP备13003013号 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-25 14:58 , Processed in 1.458550 second(s), 11 queries , File On.
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.