美国医学博士挺身而出痛斥转基因食品是一场健康灾难

2015-9-28 13:19| 发布者: 风在手| 查看: 2917| 评论: 3|原作者: 陈一文

摘要: 两项最近的发展对整个格局造成的极大改变。第一项事件：应用于转基因作物的化学除草剂的总量与品种剧增，而且正在计划目前一代人期间最大的进一步增加。第二项事件：国际癌症研究机构已经分类最广泛用于转基因作物的 ...

美国医学博士挺身而出痛斥转基因食品是一场健康灾难

(2015-09-27 17:08:09)

标签：育儿 婴儿配方乳粉 化学浸出 正己烷 草甘膦

罗驰博士是肯塔基大学医学院副教授，任肯塔基肺癌研究理事会州主席。像“皇帝的新衣”中的那个小孩一样，他大声喊出：转基因食品曾被寄予巨大的希望，被称之为世界正在发展中的食品危机的解决办法。实际上，我们遭遇食品质量危机以及对我们肠道菌群组抗生素式的破坏，造成营养缺乏症、炎症、毒素，以及缓慢发展摧毁健康的海啸。70%至80%的美国人镁缺乏，50%的美国人缺乏锌，源自转基因成分加工食品。草甘膦巨量杀死土壤以及肠道中的微生物。转基因食品含镁量与含锌量仅为正常非转基因食品的五分之一。最新的研究加剧这些担心：转基因大豆发现促进致癌物的甲醛，同时显著减少主要的解毒剂谷胱甘肽。这些问题，与普遍的基因突变结合在一起，人体排毒功能极大受损。转基因食品是造成自闭症的首选病因因素。自身免疫大脑炎症以及过量毒素以外，自闭症患儿通常存在一种基因突变，堵塞了排毒草甘膦的主要途径。国际癌症研究机构揭示，美国环保署对这些除草剂的批准都很仓促，基于设计不良、过时的研究，以及对人类接触和环境影响不完整的评估。《新英格兰医学杂志》发表了编辑部文章指出，与此有关的科学评价完全基于除草剂制造商80年代与90年代委托的至今从来没有公开发表过的研究。

Dr. Jim Roach is associate professor in the University of Kentucky College of Medicine, state chairperson for the Kentucky Lung Cancer Research Board. Like the young boy in the "Emperor's New Clothes", he shouted out: Genetically modified foods were ushered in with great promise, an answer to the world's evolving food crisis. Instead we have a meltdown in food quality and antibiotic-like destruction of our intestinal microbiome, producing nutrient deficiencies, inflammation, toxins and a slowly evolving tsunami of ill health. GM foods have only one-fifth of the magnesium and zinc of regular food. New research worsens these concerns: GM soy has been found to boost carcinogen formaldehyde, and dramatically reduce the primary detoxifier glutathione. Combined with common genetic mutations, toxin elimination is massively impaired. GM foods are the top candidate for causing autism. Beyond autoimmune brain inflammation and toxin overload, autistic children usually have a mutation blocking a key pathway for detoxifying glyphosate. The Environmental Protection Agency's approval of the herbicides was made in haste, based on poorly designed, outdated studies and on an incomplete assessment of human exposure and environmental effects, the cancer research agency said. The editorial notes the science was based solely on studies commissioned by herbicide manufacturers in the 1980s and 1990s and never published.